It has come to our attention that certain coaching centers are misusing names similar to ours, such as Vajirao or Bajirao, in an attempt to mislead and attract students/parents. Please be informed that we have no association with these fake institutes and legal proceedings have already been initiated against them before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court. We urge students and parents to stay vigilant and let us know in case they are approached by such fake institutes.

Coordinated for Change: The Global Methane Push We Need Now

19/11/2025

Key highlights

  • Rising Global Methane Emissions
  • Treat to Climate Goals
  • 2025 Global Methane Status Report
  • Key Barriers in Emission Control
  • Current Efforts are lacking
  • Need Coordinated efforts

According to the 2025 Global Methane Status Report prepared by UNEP and the CCAC, significant progression of global methane emissions has been reported, largely caused by the agriculture, energy, and waste sectors. Despite some of the improvements that the 2021 Global Methane Pledge has led to, the current mitigation efforts have fallen short in efforts to meet the 2030 targets. In turn, the report highlights the necessity of action on an international level, improved data systems, and specific financial aid.

coordinated-for-change

Tips for Aspirants
The article is critically relevant to the UPSC CSE and State Public Service Commission exams since it synthesizes the areas of climatic science, global and international policy, and sustainable development, which are major themes of the General Studies Paper III, specifically in the environmental and current affairs analysis.

Relevant Suggestions for UPSC and StatePCSExam

  • Methane potency: Methane is 84 times stronger, on a 20-year measure, than CO2, which causes about 30 percent of the global warming potential.
  • The most important sources: The most significant emissions are Agriculture (42 percent), the energy sector (oil and gas emissions), and waste (landfills and wastewater).
  • India's role: India is the third-largest emitter of methane, with the largest source as agriculture.
  • Global Methane Pledge: Over 150 countries have pledged to reduce it by 30 percent by 2030, but the current policies can only achieve 8 percent.
  • Mitigation potential. The vast majority (more than half) of potential emissions of methane are classified as low-cost or net cost reduction, especially in the energy and waste subsectors.
  • Barriers: There are weak laws and inadequate data systems and insufficient funding, and institutional gaps.
  • Data requirements: The report recommends the monitoring of a global methane observatory to be added to satellite-based surveillance.
  • Finance gap: Compared to CO2 mitigation, Methane mitigation is not sufficiently funded; it is critical to introduce specific financing.
  • Urgency: A timely reduction of methane would reduce the warming by an estimated 0.2˚C by mid-century.

Released by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) in collaboration with the Climate and Clean Air Coalition (CCAC), the 2025 Global Methane Status Report is disappointing. Methane is a powerful short-term climate pollutant that contributes to global warming by approximately 30 percent since the pre-industrial age. Although encouraged by the 2021 Global Methane Pledge, which has been signed by over 150 countries as the movement pledged to reduce its emissions by 30 percent by 2030, the intensity of the rise in emissions keeps growing, especially in the energy, farming, and waste sector. This report argues that technical solutions exist and are becoming more cost-efficient, but are still disjointed and under-invested. It reveals the significant gaps in emissions monitoring, emissions regulation, and monetary mobilization, specifically among the low and middle-income economies. However, the report points out a logical route towards achieving the 2030 goals, highlighting the importance of the concerted worldwide effort, high-quality data infrastructure, and specifically targeted financial systems.

Coordinated for Change: The Global Methane Push We Need Now

The Article looks into the findings of the report, explores industry-specific mitigation, and evaluates the institutional and financial structure that will accelerate the process. To this end, this analysis supports the argument that there is an urgent need to implement collective, highly-financed efforts to reduce methane emissions, a crucial factor in limiting global warming to 1.5˚C and safeguarding climate and human health. The global push for methane reduction is primarily driven by the Global Methane Pledge (GMP), an international initiative where 159 countries commit to collectively cut methane emissions by at least 30% below 2020 levels by 2030. Coordinated global action is needed as current national plans are insufficient to meet this goal, which is crucial for keeping the 1.5°C temperature limit within reach.

Climate Impact and Rising Emissions

The steady rise in the emission of methane is a major problem for the stability of the global climate that should be addressed immediately by taking into consideration its strong warming potential and the observed accelerated emission rates in major sectors.

Methane (CH4)
It is a greenhouse gas that is short-lived, and its global warming potential is about 84-fold of that of CO2 over a 20-year period. Unlike CO2, which remains in the atmosphere for centuries, the atmospheric lifetime of methane is approximately ten years, and it is among the key players in climate mitigation strategies that could be adopted in the near future. Its Radiative forcing potential plays a major role in the occurrence of ozone in the troposphere, thus worsening climate change as well as posing health risks to people. According to the Global Methane Status Report (2025), methane is responsible for close to one-third of present global warming. 

methane-warming

Emission Trends and Sources
The report further lists agriculture, energy, and waste as the major contributors to methane emissions. The world's agriculture contributes to 42% of all methane sources, mainly by fermentation of enteric material in livestock, rice production, and maintenance of manure. The energy industry, mainly the oil and gas, responds through the fugitive emissions, comprising leaks, venting, and flaring. Additional emissions are waste systems, including landfills and wastewater treatment. Worryingly, the gradual growth of the levels of methane is accelerated more than ever, and the levels observed today are far higher than what was scaled down to by the 2030 deadline under the Global Methane Pledge.

Emission Hotspots and Regional Disparity
The geographical differences in the emission of methane indicate the lack of response, as well as economic activity. Such as in the case of India, that is the third-largest emitter in the world, with agriculture contributing to 12 percent of the worldwide agricultural methane emissions. Unabated problems are the burning of crop residue and poor livestock management. In the meantime, the high-income nations still do not use accessible technologies to detect leaks and fix them in the fossil fuel systems, which reinforces the necessity of differentiated, but aligned mitigation strategies.

Climate Action Urgency
The extremely fast growth of methane release poses a threat to disrupt the attempts of the globe to reduce the temperature to 1.5˚C. According to the 2025 report, the current policies will only present a reduction of only 8% by the year 2030, a far lower reduction as compared to the actual target of 30%. The swift climate advantage of there being an aggressive reduction of methane could be a quick payback in terms of its short atmospheric existence. It is recommended in the report that there should be an increase in monitors and sector-specific interventions, and specific financing to bridge the gap. Methane mitigation can therefore be regarded as a climate imperative as well as a strategic opportunity to achieve rapid cost-effective development.

Key Findings and 2030 Roadmap

The 2025 Global Methane Status Report contains an ambidextrous course of action: methane emissions are continuing their rising trend, and simultaneously, a more technically viable and economical course of action stipulating significant reductions by 2030 is outlined.

Key Findings
It has been analyzed that the world's methane emissions have never been as high as they have become today, with agriculture, fossil fuel extraction, and waste management being the major sources of global emissions. Though the Global Methane Pledge, launched in 2021 and since signed by over 150 countries, suggests a rather small project figure of 8%. This deficiency is not due to a lack of solutions, as highlighted in the report, but the result of weak regulatory and implementation frameworks and mechanisms of inadequate financing. Notably, methane reduction is defined as one of the cheapest ways of taking timely climate action: more than half of the demanded cuts could be achieved at low or even negative net cost.

Sub-Sector Mitigation Opportunities
The roadmap suggests specific interventions in three main sectors. The immediate cutbacks could be realized in the energy sector through the adoption of Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) technologies and through the prohibition of regular flaring and venting. In the agricultural sector, there are solutions that can be scaled in the form of improved feed for livestock, manure management, and rice production processes. The sector that can help is the waste industry, in which better wastewater treatment and high-level landfill gas capture can be achieved. The report emphasizes the fact that these measures are not only technologically advanced, but they can produce co-benefits in terms of better air quality and population health.

Data, Control, and Responsibility
One observation that has been ground-breaking is the existence of a data gap that has continually been associated with the amount of methane emissions, especially in the low- and middle-income states. In the report, it is recommended that strong and open monitoring systems should be developed based on satellite records and open platforms. In addition, consistency in reporting and independent verification systems is suggested to ensure accountability. Improved data infrastructure is considered crucial to track the progress, guide the flow of funds, and foster the level of confidence of the population.

The 2030 Roadmap

Finally, the report outlines a practical, feasible roadmap by 2030, with the need to have concerted worldwide participation. It demands inclusion of methane targets in national plans aimed at climate reduction, intensification of international finance, and fostering of the relationships between the government and companies. Equity is another crucial point in the roadmap, as they need to support countries that have limited technical and financial capabilities. In case these steps are taken successfully, the advertised solution is a decrease in warming by 0.2˚C by mid-century, which ensures a crucial climate stabilization gap.

target-2030 Barriers to Implementation

Despite the presence of affordable mitigation solutions to deal with methane emissions, recent developments in the 2025 Global Methane Status Report cited systemic, financial, and institutional barriers impeding the higher adoption of the mitigation measures in the major emitting industries.

Poor Policy Implementation and Regulatory Laxation
The main bottleneck is that there are no strong regulatory frameworks, especially in low and middle-income countries. Countries have committed to lessening the level of methane emissions, but the implementation body is still weakly in place or absent. The problem of regulatory fragmentation along inter-jurisdictional boundaries, particularly in the energy industry and also in agricultural sectors, compromises compliance and accountability. The report highlights that without binding legislation on the national level and specific standards associated with particular sectors, voluntary engagements would not be enough to bring about a change in the system.

Information Lapses and Surveillance Problems
Effective mitigation cannot be made without reliable and high-resolution data on methane, but many countries do not even have the technical base needed to monitor their emissions. As depicted by the report, self-reported inventories are likely to underestimate emissions, especially those of oil and gas operations and decentralized sources of agriculture. Satellite monitoring has increased the level of transparency, but ground verification systems are not well developed. Such a deficiency in data poses a limitation to targeted interventions and creates an impossibility to monitor the progress toward the goals of 2030.

Lack of Financial Resources and Investment Deficits
Implementation of methane reduction technologies is expensive in the long run, and it needs initial capital, which small states can’t afford. The report observes that financial aid towards international climate reduction has been disproportionately allocated towards the reduction of carbon dioxide at the expense of methane. Furthermore, the policy uncertainty as well as the lack of definite market incentives prevent the investment of the private sector. Filling this funding gap would be necessary to expand proven solutions, especially in the waste and farming industries.

Need for Coordinated Global Action

The 2025, Global Methane Status Report highlights that uncoordinated measures will not be sufficient to meet the 2030 methane reduction targets.

The Multilateral Cooperation Imperative
The report predetermines the urgency of the necessity that methane reduction is a world public good and must be addressed collectively. Nevertheless, the Global Methane Pledge implementation is not even, with more than 150 countries endorsing it. The report, therefore, recommends strengthening multilateralism by following the route of the Climate and Clean Air Coalition, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, and the G20 forums. These institutions promote the sharing of knowledge, harmonisation of standards, and implementation of accountability. With no global approach, there is a compromise of the domestic programmes because of the exposure to cross-border issues as well as policy gaps.

Enhancing Data Authority and Openness
One of the key pillars of coordinated action is the creation of strong and interoperable systems of monitoring methane. The report suggests the introduction of satellite data, open-access platforms, and ground-based verification to achieve transparency and comparability. Also, it suggests the creation of the world methane observatory to concentrate the data and help in the independent verification. This infrastructure is considered indispensable in establishing trust and directing investment advice, as well as allowing real-time policy realignment.

barriars-to

Finance and Technical Support
The report points out that there is also a pressing necessity for specific financial tools to facilitate the reduction of methane, especially in low and middle-income nations. It recommends the increase of the climate financing toolkits, like the Green Climate Fund and the multilateral development banks, to focus on methane-specific projects. It further requests donor governments and the private investors to help in capacity-building, technology transfer, and pilot programs. Both the magnitude and urgency of the challenge of methane have to be consistent with financial flows.

National Climate Strategies
Lastly, the report suggests integrating targets into Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and long-term plans in regard to climate. This consolidation would promote the elevation of methane mitigation as a priority in national policy and make it coherent with the decarbonisation objectives on the national level. The report further promotes sectoral action plans to governments, which are backed by regulatory requirements and performance-based rewards. Such institutionalisation is deemed important in terms of sustaining the momentum that surpasses the cycles of individual politics.

Conclusion

To sum up, the Global Methane Status Report 2025 defines an elusive turning point in the context of global climate regulation. Despite the continued rise in anthropogenic emissions of methane, the report identifies an actionable but cost-effective path that leads to a significant reduction of emissions by the year 2030. However, to actualize this potential, it will be required to overcome the systemic obstacles, such as management gaps, gaps in empirical evidence, and financial and institutional barriers. Methane mitigation is urgently needed to be included in national and international climate regimes, which is highlighted by the exhortation of solidarity of action on a global scale, endorsed by strong data systems and systematically distributed budgets as a policy guaranteed by the document. Rapid and concerted activity of methane is a necessary requirement for the achievement of half the climate condition stabilization and maintenance of planetary health.