small dip in voter turnout at 66.7%, around 3% less than in the 2019 elections. While the first phase also saw a small dip compared to 2019, India’s state and national elections have historically seen relatively high voter turnouts – seen as one of the signs of a healthy democracy. “We do not have government by the majority. We have government by the majority who participate” (THOMAS JEFFERSON)

WHY VOTE?

  • In democracies, voting is seen as a basic exercise that shows people’s faith in the political process.
  • The right to vote, after all, has also been secured by various disadvantaged groups – colonised people, women, racial and ethnic minorities – after long struggles.
  • Voting gives each person a say in deciding who will hold positions of power in their society and is a crucial part of exercising one’s citizenship.
  • Having the right to vote also makes one feel part of a larger community where their voice matters.

WHY PEOPLE NOT VOTING?

  • Structural Barriers
  • Voter Apathy
In modern times, this is not because of structural barriers to voting, often, but due to voter apathy.

IMPACT OF NOT VOTING

“We do not have government by the majority. We have government by the majority who participate”
  • The quote talks about one of the fundamental contradictions associated with democracy. It is supposed to be a rule of the people, by the people, for the people. But if most people are not part of the process, then it cannot be any of those things.
  • Democracy is often criticised as a rule of the majority over the minority, too, if enough safeguards are not instituted to keep autocracy at bay. However, in case of voter apathy or barriers to voting, the majority is not even registering its voice at all.
    • This could be dangerous for the overall health of existing political mechanisms, since only a few people are picking the popular representatives. It could allow for the small voting population which votes to be identified, manipulated and polarised in favour of certain parties or candidates.
  • Moreover, it implies that vast sections of people feel detached from the systems holding the power to impact their lives.
    • Voter apathy is also often seen in mature democracies, which might hint at a sense of disillusionment with the process among a population over time, or a view that voting does not help change things.
    • Many are also put off by the invisible levers that move politics, like behind-the-scenes lobbying and electoral funding by vested interests.
  • Young people tend to vote less as compared to elders as they cannot identify themselves with the candidate. (An analysis in The Economist a few years ago where young voters in UK & USA were surveyed).

THE PHENOMENON OF NEGATIVE VOTING: HELPFUL?

In 2013, the Indian Supreme Court allowed for the option ‘None of the Above’ to be introduced in Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assembly elections to allow such views to be expressed. “Not allowing a person to cast vote negatively defeats the very freedom of expression and the right ensured in Article 21, i.e. the right to liberty a provision of negative voting would be in the interest of promoting democracy as it would send clear signals to political parties and their candidates as to what the electorate think about them. The mechanism of negative voting, thus, serves a very fundamental and essential part of a vibrant democracy,”