It has come to our attention that certain coaching centers are misusing names similar to ours, such as Vajirao or Bajirao, in an attempt to mislead and attract students/parents. Please be informed that we have no association with these fake institutes and legal proceedings have already been initiated against them before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court. We urge students and parents to stay vigilant and let us know in case they are approached by such fake institutes.

RUSSIA & CHINA VETO ON UN RESOLUTION from Vajirao & Reddy Institute

By : Author Desk Updated : 2026-04-07 12:54:50

RUSSIA & CHINA VETO ON UN RESOLUTION

Why in News?
  • On 7 April 2026, Russia and China vetoed a resolution in the United Nations Security Council related to the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz.
  • The resolution was introduced amid:
    • Ongoing US–Iran conflict
    • Rising global energy crisis
THE RESULT
  • The voting result was:
    • 11 votes in favour
    • 2 vetoes (Russia, China)
    • 2 abstentions (Pakistan, Colombia)
  • The vote took place just before a deadline set by Donald Trump demanding Iran reopen the Strait.
This event highlights global power divisions and limits of UN action IMPORTANCE OF STRAIT OF HORMUZ
  • The Strait of Hormuz is a strategic maritime chokepoint
Key Facts:
  • Around 20% of global oil supply passes through it
  • It connects:
    • Persian Gulf ? Arabian Sea
During Conflict:
  • Iran restricted movement in the Strait
  • This led to:
    • Sharp rise in global oil prices
    • Threat to global energy security
Gulf countries considered this an existential threat ABOUT THE PROPOSED UN RESOLUTION Initial Proposal
  • Proposed by Bahrain
  • __________It aimed to:
    • Ensure free navigation
    • Reopen the Strait
  • Initially allowed:
    • Use of “all necessary means” (including military force)
Dilution of Resolution :
  • Due to opposition from Russia, China, France:
Changes made:
  • Removed:
    • Use of offensive force
  • Limited to:
    • Defensive measures only
  • Further diluted to:
    • Only encourage coordination among countries
    • No direct authorization of action
The resolution became very weak FINAL PROVISION OF THE RESOLUTION
  • It encouraged countries to:
    • Protect commercial shipping
    • Escort merchant vessels
    • Ensure safe navigation
  • It demanded Iran to:
    • Stop attacks on ships and infrastructure
    • Respect freedom of navigation
However, it had no binding enforcement mechanism WHY DID RUSSIA & CHINA VETO?
  • Russia and China argued that:
    • The US and Israel started the conflict
    • Military pressure would increase tensions
  • They emphasized:
    • Need for immediate ceasefire
    • Preference for diplomatic solution
Their veto reflects geopolitical alignment and strategic interests IMPACT OF THE VETO On Global Governance
  • Shows limitations of:
    • United Nations system
  • Even with majority support:
    • A single veto can block action
On Conflict
  • No strong international action to:
    • Reopen Strait
    • Protect shipping
  • Conflict continued without:
    • Effective global intervention
On Global Economy
  • Continued:
    • Energy supply disruption
    • High oil prices
Increased economic uncertainty worldwide REACTION OF COUNTRIES
  • Gulf countries (like Bahrain) expressed concern:
    • Said failure sends wrong signal globally
  • The resolution was seen as:
    • A missed opportunity to ensure maritime security
ABOUT UNSC Basic Features
  • The United Nations Security Council is:
    • One of the 6 principal organs of the UN
  • Established in:
    • 1945
  • Main role:
    • Maintain international peace and security
Structure : Total Members: 15 Permanent Members (P5)
  • Countries:
    • China, France, Russia, UK, USA
  • Special power:
    • Veto Power
Any one veto can block a resolution Non-Permanent Members (10)
  • Elected for:
    • 2-year terms
  • Based on:
    • Geographical representation
Voting System
  • A resolution requires:
    • At least 9 votes in favour
    • No veto by P5 members
KEY POWERS
  • Sanctions (economic restrictions)
  • Peacekeeping missions
  • Authorization of military action
  • Conflict investigation
Legal Authority
  • Under Article 25 of UN Charter:
    • Members must follow UNSC decisions
Makes UNSC decisions legally binding SIGNIFICANCE OF UNSC IN THIS CASE
  • UNSC acted as:
    • A global negotiation platform
  • However:
    • Veto power prevented action Highlights:
  • Power politics over global consensus
CONCLUSION
  • The veto by Russia and China reflects:
    • Geopolitical rivalry
    • Limits of multilateral institutions
  • Despite global concern:
    • UNSC could not take effective action
  • The event shows that:
    • International peace mechanisms depend heavily on major powers’ interests
  Note: Connect with Vajirao & Reddy Institute to keep yourself updated with latest UPSC Current Affairs in English. Note: We upload Current Affairs Except Sunday.